|
|||
| May 2004 There must have been something in the air last month because the intersection between government and volunteers made the news in all sorts of ways during April, and in different countries, too. The news stories were not related to National Volunteer Week, which (as always) created nary a blip on the media radar screen. Each article in itself could be discussed and dissected in positive and negative ways by volunteer program managers. That’s not what I want to do here. Instead, I’d like to step back and think about what members of the general public might think after reading these sorts of stories. A Sampling of the News Stories The “Breaking News” item on the Energize homepage for the week of April 11th (http://energizeinc.com/news.html) concerned a recent California state labor ruling requiring anyone who does any work on a watershed restoration project to be paid. What started as a legitimate attempt to stop contractors from avoiding the costs of expensive labor has become a blanket restriction against any involvement of volunteers in an arena with decades of volunteer participation history. On the other side of the world, The New Zealand Herald ran the following story on 8 April:
A different volunteer incident made the news in the Sun-Sentinel in Broward County, Florida (3 April):
This time, a possibly creative idea for citizen engagement is caught in the middle of a political power struggle. Volunteers should never be exploited for the political ends of an official nor to circumvent government rules. But, on the other hand, if a government leader is able to engage the help of qualified volunteers to serve the municipality, is there a problem we can’t see? This theme is echoed in the following two news stories, also written in April. The Laurel Leader ran a local story about its Maryland town. In this case, deploying volunteers to give parking tickets is seen as a plus by the police department, the storekeepers, the shoppers, and the volunteers – though later in the article there is some griping about the parking regulations themselves.
On April 23rd, politicians in Malaysia questioned community service mandates in their country, in The Star Online:
This seems to be the eternal debate over mandates, qualifications, and mission. Is the goal to serve the public or to give NS trainees something to do? One of the elements here is also the differences and similarities between “community service” and “volunteering,” an issue highlighted in this April 15th New York Times article:
This story hits readers on various levels: Is some required community service fair recompense for publicly-supported housing? Should people in public housing be given less right to choose to volunteer or not than other citizens? Is this a huge fuss over 96 hours a year (less than 2 a week)? Conversely, some government entities don’t even value volunteering genuinely offered as good citizenship, such as the school board in Mapletown , Pennsylvania , whose April public meeting was covered by the local newspaper, the Observer-Reporter:
I wonder whether the reporter – or most of the citizens of Mapletown – also realize that the school board members themselves are volunteers? What Message Does the Public Receive? None of these news stories is all that special alone and few people would have seen all of them in one month as I did. But I think we in the volunteer field have to pay attention to the effect of the mixed messages government sends to the public about volunteering, particularly through the news media. The average citizen has no context within which to understand most of these stories and so take their cues from the reporter in each case. So if the issues are presented simplistically (or not at all), or if volunteers or employees are slightly ridiculed, how does a reader know that there’s more to know? To me, the key issue is whether or not the cumulative effect of a stream of news stories like these (even if over a longer period of time) ends up flavoring the reaction of people to things like agency recruitment messages. What do you think the answers might be to questions like these:
References: Because news stories online often disappear after a few weeks, we have posted the full text of the longer articles here on our site. They are linked from each excerpt within the Hot Topic above. 1
New Zealand Herald, 8 April 2004. Online
at http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm? 2 KCRG-TV9 News, Iowa City, Iowa, 19 April 2004, online at: http://www.kcrg.com/article.aspx?art_id=80664&cat_id=123 3 Sun-Sentinel, Broward County, Florida , 3 April 2004 . Found online at: http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sfl-48fteprogram,0,4845465.story?coll=sfla-news-broward (no longer posted) 4
Laurel Leader, Maryland, April (day unknown)
2004. Found online at: http://news.mywebpal.com/news_tool_v2.cfm?pnpID=810& 5
Star Publications, Malaysia, 23 April 2004. Online
at: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp? 6The
New York Times, 15 April 2004. Online at: ttp://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/15/nyregion/15HOUS.html? 7Observer-Reporter, Mapletown, Pennsylvania, April (day unknown) 2004. Found online at: http://www.observer-reporter.com/280350795890528.bsp (no longer posted)
Let's Hear What You Think |
|
Energize empowers and inspires leaders of volunteers worldwide. Our specialty is creating and selecting the most relevant, innovative resources in volunteer management. We’re advocates for the power of volunteers and for the recognition of the leaders who unleash it. About Us
Energize, Inc., 5450 Wissahickon Ave., Philadelphia PA 19144 Phone: 215-438-8342, Fax: 215-438-0434 Contact Us By E-mail
![]()
Register for our free monthly e-mail update
[Hot Topic] [Bookstore] [Library][Referral Network ] [Recognition] [Jobs] [Search] [About Us] [Site Map] [Home]
[Home: http://www.energizeinc.com]